Tuesday, September 30, 2025

Micro-Lesson Plan

 


EDIT

Two-Up

Lesson Goals:
  • Know where Two-Up came from
    • Share something new about Australia and its culture
  • Be able to participate and/or lead a round of Two-Up

Resources:
Lesson Structure and Timing
  • Introduction (2 - 3 minutes)
    • Instructor and learners stand in a circle in the space
    • Instructor begins with an 'Imagine...' story to set the scene and historical impetus for the game
      • The story links the game to the Australian national identity through the Diggers (soldiers) playing this game in the trenches
      • It involves betting; learners are advised that they can observe only
      • Various dates for the first recorded instance, usually tied to WWI soldiers
    • The instructor then shares that this game was declared illegal in Australia for 364 days of the year; the one 'legal' day is tied to the game's history in the trenches. (The question of why is not asked at this stage.)
    • Instructor shares lesson goals with students

  • Game rules and demonstration (5 - 6 minutes)
    • The instructor introduces the materials needed for the game: kip (ruler), two coins, ring
    • The instructor offers the opportunity for participants to be observers only
    • Game 'characters' introduced (not necessary to be known for the ability to play)
      • Ringer
      • Boxer
      • Spinner
      • Spectators
      • Cockatoo
    • Round 1: Rules are shared as the game is demonstrated by student participants
      • If the Spinner tosses two heads (HH) they win (i.e., they keep their bet and the Spectator match)
      • If the Spinner tosses 'odds' -- one head, one tail -- the Spinner keeps tossing
      • If the Spinner tosses two tails (TT), they lose (the betting Spectator wins/collects)
      • New Spinner (traditionally the Spectator to the left of the Spinner in the circle of participants), game continues
    • Rounds 2 - 3 (time dependent)
      • Student-led rounds for those comfortable participating 

  • Closing (1 - 2 minutes)
    • Thank everyone for trying something new
    • Thumbs up/thumbs down about whether students learned something new about Australia
    • Thumbs up/thumbs down about whether they are understood their role in the game while playing













Sunday, September 28, 2025

Assignment 1 Reflections



Group Response

Students: Jimena, Juma, Shannon
Artwork, Artist:
12 Golden E-Chains Spiral, Philippe Leblanc


Jimena took the main responsibility for assembling the artwork. Prior to this, we met to discuss whether this would be a viable task, what materials would be needed, and to lay out the production process of the piece itself. We also looked into how to extend this for the classroom. We tried to understand the way the artist calculated the lengths and positions of each chain. There were also practical considerations about the available box sizes and how to bead sizes might relate to this.

The original artwork was recreated with purchases from Michael’s and Amazon. So, some aspects of our piece were chosen out of practicality (for example, Leblanc’s work used a square-based rectangular prism whose lateral faces were in the proportions of the golden ratio). We began with spreadsheets to calculate bead colour amounts. As we were determining the lengths of each chain and the position of each chain, we found that we were trying to honour the golden ratio that appeared in Leblanc’s work as well as the golden spiral that determined each chain’s place. In reality, we were able to mimic the bead count in the five longest chains; however, the remaining chain lengths were more arbitrary. We worked within the constraint that we wanted 700 beads in total and projected possible lengths that seemed plausible for the shorter chain lengths. To determine the placement of the chains, a printout from Leblanc’s information on the Bridges Math site was used. Another alteration of the piece is that we chose our own colour scheme of 10 colours.

We decided to follow Leblanc’s inspiration of irrational numbers. The first thought was to build a project around pi. However, this didn’t play out in a way that we anticipated. So, we pivoted and focused on square roots. Using either straight edge and compass or paper folding, we could create lengths that were irrational. We were also guided by the Grade 11 curriculum, which requested that we order irrational numbers. From this, we decided to ask the students to fold a Theodorus spiral from a single, long strip of paper. The plan was that the spiral served as the base for our class-focused extension to the art project: a square root mobile. The hope was that this would mimic the beads of Leblanc’s chains. (In a real class, we think that we would have also asked students to create them using different colours for each digit of the decimal expansion of each root, provided it didn’t get too confusing visually.) We have them hung from a ring so that the magnitude of each chain is reflected in relation to the bead chain that represented root one. (We felt this provided a visual to the ordering aspect that is required by the Grade 11 Pre-Calculus syllabus.)

    






Individual Reflection


From participating in creating this art project, I learned a number of things.

Mathematically, I explored the catenary more than I had previously. I used technology to enable this exploration and tried to build on this in relation to chain length. I didn't find that I followed through much more than that. Consequently, I didn't find this project as mathematically involved as some others had the potential to be. The other (debatable) mathematics involved was in the actual spreadsheet skills that enabled determining the correct amounts of beads were not trivial (and had the potential to be transferred to statistics). This, for me, added to the depth of the recreation of an activity like this for students.





I do feel that I gained more from this project as a student and as a teacher, and I cannot really separate the two experiences as cleanly as the question prompt suggests.
As a student in the 342 class, the group nature of the project is where I feel I had the most to learn. Yes, there was a cool little art project involved, but the logistics involved in organizing a group provided some challenges. Dividing up work so that each person made a valuable and fair contribution was a consideration. Also, there needed to be the overall 'now it's done' evaluation, and it can be hard to come to a consensus about that.

As a teacher candidate, I feel I learned the most. We recognized straight away that getting people to put beads on strings is not really a valuable math learning experience. So, the question of what to do for an activity weighed heavily. First of all, I wanted to make a history of pi activity out of it. Pi is one of the poster children of irrational numbers, and one that influenced Leblanc as well. However, some research revealed that, even with very directed scaffolding, the activity might not be as fruitful as I'd hoped. This prompted the square root mobile. This one had potential; however, the challenge with this is that the links to the original artwork may not be immediately evident. So, there was work on the teaching side of it to maintain those links. The actual amount of preparation for a five- to seven-minute activity was also quite heavy. So much work goes into planning and preparing an activity. However, the production of a model ties the ideas together visually.
The first fold of the spiral of Theodorus, the planned class activity.

Continuing the Theodorus spiral 

The satisfaction of this project is the mobile that would have been a product of each group in the class. Mathematics is about relationships, and each string of beads of our class mobile means so much more when it is in relation to the other strands. The context gives it meaning. The biggest difficulty for me was that we did not have the time to put it together in class. (The teacher-sided effort that was invested did not pay off as I'd hoped.)
    
I do hope to bring these ideas into a classroom as a way to fill out the Rainbow of Why (Dave Stuart Jr). I intentionally chose materials that were reasonable accessible in a classroom. But I could see a potential downfall in the time that might need to be invested in a project like this. However, if the planning is there, then it has the potential to be managed. Math gives people a way to engage with the world. And not only in practical ways. These relationships find their ways into entertainment and art and participating in an interdisciplinary activity like this helps to foster mathematics as a lens through which to view the world.

Tuesday, September 16, 2025

Reflections on Skemp

Richard Skemp's "Relational Understanding and Instrumental Understanding" prompted a stop or two and a few smiles and nods. 

Where I did stop in Skemp's article was when he presented his analogy of learning (and teaching) math as a person knowing selected routes between places and that same person wandering around with the aim of developing his mental map. This analogy seemed to make a lot of sense for me. To help explain why, I will share the following anecdote.

While reading this article, I could not escape my own epistemic relationship to math and the curriculum that I was responsible for teaching in my first few years as a teacher. My very first math class was a grade seven group of girls (twinned in a co-ed school). I was super keen to take them, but I really was taking it unit by unit. (And, if I'm honest, other issues -- classroom management -- were really demanding more of my attention.) The next year, I had another grade seven class and a grade eight class (among others). At this stage in my teaching, I was fumbling around in survival mode. It wasn't until my fourth year in a classroom that I had the capacity to productively reflect on the broader scope of my own teaching. By that stage, I had been exposed to enough grade levels and courses to start wandering around/exploring the campus, as Skemp put it. I was absolutely that junior teacher mentioned by Skemp -- despite her best intentions -- who walked the routes. I walked routes (I feel) in my own math learning and definitely in my own math teaching. But, somewhere in year four, I had started to explore (following the metaphor) in my teaching and in my understanding of mathematical relationships. I gained a modest level of confidence, and I concluded that the best thing that I was able to do for my grade nine teaching was teach grade eight, the best thing for my grade eight teaching was to teach seven, and so on. This long-view meant that I could see features of the landscape -- the relationships that the curriculum sought to share -- and find ways to draw them together. Perhaps that is what draws me toward concept-based teaching now.

Generally speaking, I agree with what Skemp discusses. While there is a feeling to want to prioritize relational mathematics, I am not willing to set aside the role that instrumental mathematics plays and has. Sometimes mathematics is done for utilitarian purposes. And I can sympathize with learners who see something that they're not sure about and just want to know what to do. So I feel that until we adjust what it means to be successful in a math classroom, then it will be even harder to prioritize relational mathematics learning.

Textbooks and their readers

How do I respond to the examples provided here -- as a teacher and a former student? In reading this article and reflecting on my experience...